Jump to content


0

Can someone test HSRP in Packet Tracer 6.0 for me


1 reply to this topic

#1 markjw

markjw

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3 posts
  • 16 thanks

Posted 04 July 2013 - 08:31 PM

Mods: please move this if it is in the wrong place

I have tried the following senario in Packet Tracer 6.0 build 45 and 6.0.1 build 11 and have had the same problem - the setup is as follows:

Switch 1 - Cisco 3560-24

VLAN 10 created and an interface created - int vlan 10 ip address 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.0
fa0/0 - dot1q VLAN trunk with VLAN10 allowed
fa0/1 - dot1q VLAN trunk with VLAN10 allowed

Router 1 - Cisco 2811

interface fa0/0 connected to Switch 1 fa0/0
sub interface fa0/0.10 created on VLAN10 - IP address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
HSRP setup on fa0/0.10 - standby IP address 192.168.1.3, priority 50

Router 2 - Cisco 2811

interface fa0/0 connected to Switch 1 fa0/1
sub interface fa0/0.10 created on VLAN10 - IP address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
HSRP setup on fa0/0.10 - standby IP address 192.168.1.3, priority 100

Initally all looks good - I see HSRP go from Speak to Active and I can ping the 192.168.1.3 address from the router that has HSRP Active. However if I try and ping 192.168.1.3 from either Switch 1 or the HSRP Standby I get no response (ping to 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 work OK)- also if I setup the other interface on the 2811 routers and another switch, I cannot route traffic via 192.168.1.3

Any help appreciated as the same setup works on real hardware with no problem - so am I doing something wrong with Packet Tracer or is there a bug?

Thanks,
Mark

Thanked by 2 Members:
jeff001 , buchka

#2 gangaskan

gangaskan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
  • 1 thanks

Posted 25 March 2014 - 02:23 PM

it might be a bug.  

when i did it in packet tracer in my NNP class we used L3 switches instead of 2811's   you might want to try that. i want to say we used 3750's in the packet tracer lab.  


you also might want to try shutting down both interfaces and bringing them back up one by one.  i know some stuff in Packet tracer tends to like that a lot, like etherchannel.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Organization

Community

Downloads

Test Providers

Site Info


Go to top