Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
cdipman

Best solution for H2 and H2+ section 4.1

Recommended Posts

Do we have these additional statements in H2+ as below?

 

- Required protocols should be allowed except for those who has ttl of 0 and 1.

- Specifically stated not to use a deny statement.

 

 

Spoto and C4C use the deny sequences in the solutions for both labs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can avoid using deny statements by creating 2 separate access-lists, one for the permitted traffic (with all permit statements) and one for the denied ttl 0/1 traffic (also with all permit statements), create 2 class-maps (one for the allowed), referring to the first access-list and the other for the ttl 0/1 traffic, referring to the 2nd access-list. Finally in the policy map, you refer to both classes, the allowed class you leave empty (which means that is permitted), and the second ttl class you drop. With this approach you achieve the same, but without deny statements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...