Jump to content

hubin1

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About hubin1

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Sorry, I dont have them but they are not too hard. It is basic behavior of vPC and vPC+ same with ACI. One of the questions asks for intermittent VM connectivity issue through VMM integration and what the cause of it is. Do you have to OTV and the FCoE question?
  2. Dynfitz88 - did you get any more info on this question?
  3. Hi guys, Quick question on VXLAN setup for the lab. It seems it is just simple flood and learn configuration without EVPN and no anycast gateway. Can someone confirm? Thanks
  4. Hey guys. I am not sure what is the best way to reach you guys to share my email address to further discuss the voucher detail. I have the vouchers you guys are asking for. message me if you can.
  5. Cool for which voucher? Ping me on my email. Emails not allowed. Read the rules or get banned.
  6. Hi guys, I have many CCENT, CCNP, and CCIE/CCDE written vouchers. It is valid voucher from Cisco and do not expire until December of 2018. If you interested, please let me know.
  7. Would you post VCE for NSO-157 Exam Thanks!
  8. hubin1

    Netapp Study Group

    Anyone studying for NSO-157? Do you have any study material and dump that you can share?
  9. Thank for your reply. that make sense. if that is the case, there is no need to add distance or backdoor command to increase the distance to favor EIGRP external default route. I dont want to put extra command if is not necessary. Thanks
  10. Hi Chon99, I have the exact same question. I looked over the solutions that was provided and i dont see that there is an answer for this issue. Did you make any progress with this?
  11. I experience the same thing. I created my own similar MPLS lab on GNS3, several with similar environment, and I can traceroute and ping from CE and PE routers to the destination. Not sure why I can't on IOU. I validate MPLS labels and routes for both control and data plane and it seems to be good...Any idea guys?
  12. Hey guys, I have a question on Alinux1 BGP question 5: Networks hosted behind Internet must be able to be reached from R12 in EIGRP 145 Domain. R12 should be able to prefer the reachability thorugh R22 rather than R21. Fix the so that the following traceroute from R12 should be matched with the output as given below: When it mentions: "Networks hosted behind Internet must be able to be reached from R12 in EIGRP 145 Domain. R12 should be prefer the reachability through R22 rather than R21", are they referring to he MED value that is specified on the route-map out on R21 and R22? It is currently set to prefer R21 as it has lower MED and I also see that on R32 rib that it prefers R21 over R22. I dont see on the answer sheet to change the MED value to reflect this requirement. am i missing something? aTS01_R21 route-map MED permit 10 set metric 100 aTS01_R22 route-map MED permit 5 match ip address prefix-list 194 set metric 100 route-map MED permit 10 set metric 200 R32 Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 8.8.8.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i * 123.0.0.0 134.56.78.13 200 0 12345 i *> 134.56.78.5 100 0 12345 i * 123.3.3.3/32 134.56.78.13 200 0 12345 i *> 134.56.78.5 100 0 12345 i * 123.4.4.4/32 134.56.78.13 200 0 12345 i *> 134.56.78.5 100 0 12345 i * 125.45.67.24/30 134.56.78.13 200 0 12345 i *> 134.56.78.5 100 0 12345 i * 134.0.0.0/8 134.56.78.13 200 0 12345 i *> 134.56.78.5 100 0 12345 i * 134.56.78.8/30 134.56.78.13 200 0 12345 i *> 134.56.78.5 100 0 12345 i *> 194.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 194.1.1.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 194.1.2.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 194.1.3.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i 123.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks B 123.0.0.0/8 [20/100] via 134.56.78.5, 01:08:40 B 123.3.3.3/32 [20/100] via 134.56.78.5, 01:08:40 B 123.4.4.4/32 [20/100] via 134.56.78.5, 00:13:35 125.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 125.45.67.24 [20/100] via 134.56.78.5, 00:13:35 B 134.0.0.0/8 [20/100] via 134.56.78.5, 01:08:40 134.56.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks B 134.56.78.8/30 [20/100] via 134.56.78.5, 01:09:11
  13. Hi guys, I am stuck on MPLS question and I am wondering if someone can get provide some clarification. What is the purpose of multiple sub interface between R3 to R7 and R4 to R8 with one VRF only set to import without export and and the other VRF with no import but export. What is the correct solution?
×
×
  • Create New...