Jump to content

slimy_cat

Members
  • Content Count

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

slimy_cat last won the day on March 3 2018

slimy_cat had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

591 Excellent

1 Follower

About slimy_cat

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

83 profile views
  1. Same error for me. {ADDED} Using A+ VCE is perfect. Use it on GenyMotion.
  2. L2 image is high_iron compiled on 10-May-18. Compiled Thu 10-May-18 Switch#sh ver Cisco IOS Software, Linux Software (I86BI_LINUXL2-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.2(CML_NIGHTLY_20180510)FLO_DSGS7, EARLY DEPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT BUILD, synced to V152_6_0_81_E Technical Support: [Hidden Content] Copyright (c) 1986-2018 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 10-May-18 02:45 by mmen L3 image is NOT high_iron and NOT compiled on 10-May-18. Compiled Wed 28-Mar-18 Router#sh ver Cisco IOS Software, Linux Software (I86BI_LINUX-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.7(3)M2, DEVELOPMENT TEST SOFTWARE Technical Support: [Hidden Content] Copyright (c) 1986-2018 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Wed 28-Mar-18 11:18 by prod_rel_team Be notified.
  3. Q19 How many address families can a single 0SPFv3 instance support? A.5 B.2 C.1 D.10 Answer: C ==== What means "instance"? If that is "router ospfv3" statement, the answer must be "2". If that is "process", answer must be "1". [Hidden Content] Prerequisites for OSPFv3 Address Families To use the IPv4 unicast address families (AF) in OSPFv3, you must enable IPv6 on a link, although the link may not be participating in IPv6 unicast AF. With the OSPFv3 Address Families feature, users may have two processes per interface, but only one process per AF. If the AF is IPv4, an IPv4 address must first be configured on the interface, but IPv6 must be enabled on the interface.
  4. Q23 Refer to the exhibit, which two options are problems that can occur with this configuration? (Choose two) A.The label for the R5 loopback address is filtered from other MPLS routers B.MPLS traffic from R1 to R5 takes a suboptimal path C.The MPLS path from R1 to R5 becomes unreachable D.The label for the R1 loopback address is filtered from MPLS routers E.R1 and R5 are unable to establish an LDP relationship Answer: A, C === This question is absolutely stupid. OSPF config is totally wrong for R5. 1. There's wrong "network" statement, which means that OSPF will not work on Gi0/0 interface (ip 10.0.0.1 doesn't exist, so 0.0.0.0 area 0 will not work on interface); 2. How 2 routers connected to the intermediate one (P1) will work in the same subnet 10/24? So, my answer would be "it will not work at all because of wrong IGP config", even before any MPLS/LDP stuff. I don't hope Cisco listen to my complain, but I would answer "C, E" for this idiotic question.
  5. VIRL has not only routers/switches images, but also LXCs: Linux Container Images Ubuntu 16.04 LXC iPerf 2.0.2 LXC Routem 2.1(8) LXC Ostinato-drone 0.8 LXC I would be interested in Routem. It's a great tool to generate a lot of routes through any dynamic routing protocols. With it you can generate as much BGP routes as you want and leave your comfort zone, having slow router's performance. That's good for ISP training. Can anybody extract the images from installed VIRL? They should be located in /var/lib/glance/images/ , as mentioned here [Hidden Content]
  6. Same shit with I7.2. switch(config)# evpn esi multihoming switch(config-evpn-es-mh)# 2017 Dec 19 17:53:34 switch %$ VDC-1 %$ %SYSMGR-SLOT1-2-SERVICE_CRASHED: Service "bcm_usd" (PID 29884) hasn't caught signal 11 (core will be saved). 2017 Dec 19 17:53:34 switch %$ VDC-1 %$ %SYSMGR-SLOT1-2-HAP_FAILURE_SUP_RESET: Service "bcm_usd" in vdc 1 has had a hap failure 2017 Dec 19 17:53:34 switch %$ VDC-1 %$ %SYSMGR-SLOT1-2-LAST_CORE_BASIC_TRACE: fsm_action_become_offline: PID 17684 with message Could not turn off console logging on vdc 1 error: mts req-response with syslogd in vdc 1 failed (0xFFFFFFFF) . 2017 Dec 19 17:53:55 switch %$ VDC-1 %$ %SYSMGR-SLOT1-2-LAST_CORE_BASIC_TRACE: save_core: PID 483 with message cd /var/sysmgr/tmp_logs ; /isan/bin/sysmgr_logmgr 0x102_bcm_usd 29884 1 1>> /mnt/pss/core_handling.log 2>> /mnt/pss/core_handling.log failed with ret val 768 . [ 477.855532] [1513706038] Restarting system.
  7. Does anyone have the 2017-Nov high_iron IOL and IOSv images?
  8. Does anybody know what is the difference of "VMX" and "VMX SR" images for vMX?
  9. 1. That's route leakind, wrong answer. Attached bit injects the default route in L1 area.
  10. Nobody talks about MPLS. I know what means VRF LITE, that's just a set of separated routing tables. I insist C is correct, because B doesn't make sense. You can connect to the router the different customers and seggregate them from each other with vrf lite. however, it doesn't mean they may use the same internet access with overlapping customer' networks, because you can provide the access from customer to internet, but not vice versa without NAT. I agree, the question and answers are absolutely stupid. But that's a Cisco style for a long time already.
  11. "C. Multiple ISP customers can be supported on one customer edge device." Customer Edge device means CE, not PE. Answers are in wrong manner, I know, but B is incorrect because I can't imagine the way how one customer can use overlapping networks in the same VRF. So, A is truly correct, DE are bullshit, only one is correct from BC and I suppose it should be C.
  12. passed today. 213 is valid. no new dnd. new question was about several multicast domain and messages of PR between those domains ([Hidden Content]).
×
×
  • Create New...