Jump to content

lsatype7

Members
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About lsatype7

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Hi Naruto1983, file you have upload probably has sort of key or protection. Can you try do that again but disable any file protection. I tried to load on VCE and getting error "key decrypt error" Congrats, Thank you in advance!
  2. please add me there...
  3. lsatype7

    SP 4.1 Lab 2018

    Hi Guys, Can anyone share the TS1,TS2 & CFG files? is there any skype group ? I'm looking take my exam September this year.
  4. lsatype7

    TS3 in SP Track

    Hi Guys, can anyone share the TS1,TS2 & CFG file ? I'm looking take the exam next 4 months. Regards
  5. @layerlayer1 ! Congrats buddy! How was the multicast question? R17 is the RP ? R19 is the sender and R20-R21 are receivers ? You had to configure ip pim nbma-mode ? Thank you in advance!
  6. Did you have any problem to bing PPP up and get ip address ? I'm facing issues get PPP address from ISP when I use VRF is there any specific configuration should've be done ? Thank you all. R19#sh ppp all Interface/ID OPEN+ Nego* Fail- Stage Peer Address Peer Name ------------ --------------------- -------- --------------- -------------------- Vi2 LCP+ CDPCP- LocalT 0.0.0.0 R49 R19#sh run int eth0/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 128 bytes ! interface Ethernet0/1 vrf forwarding LOCALSP no ip address pppoe enable group global pppoe-client dial-pool-number 2 end R19#sh run int dialer 02 Building configuration... Current configuration : 214 bytes ! interface Dialer2 vrf forwarding LOCALSP no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer pool 2 ppp chap hostname Jamesons-R19 ppp chap password 0 CCIE ! ! !
  7. Hi Merta, I have the same doubts Does this 64bit eigrp only applies to AS65006 or does it apply to ALL EIGRP ROUTERS in AS65007 and AS65005 as well? A friend mentioned in the exam just was requested to configure the EIGRP 64bits on AS65006 . Another question is R2 on MPLS Core , I heard in the exam just was requested to configure BGP on PE's what does not necessarily configure R2 as BGP router, Did you do the same. Thank you for your time !! Congrats enjoy your number!
  8. Thank you Noobotron, I believe I made a mistake in the sec 2.3 where is requested to all core routers tag the routes I understood just R50 and R51 should do that no routers at all. Thank you again! I appreciate your answer.
  9. Hi Noobotron, First of all congrats for your Number enjoy it. Sec 2.7 on workbook H2/A5 there is a mutual redistribution between R9 and R10, requesting avoid routing loops and ensure that all current future prefixes are routed via their optimal path. Without use Access-list or prefix , it's the same on Exam ? I friend of mine mentioned there is output that must match where R10 prefer reach 52.52.52.52/32 via EIGRP external route. I solved it using the follow way: R9, R10 ! route-map OSPF_TO_EIGRP deny 10 match tag 900 ! route-map OSPF_TO_EIGRP deny 20 match tag 1000 ! route-map OSPF_TO_EIGRP permit 30 ! ! ! router eigrp CCIE ! address-family ipv4 unicast autonomous-system 1 ! topology base redistribute ospf 65001 metric 100 100 255 1 1500 route-map OSPF_TO_EIGRP ! ! router ospf 65001 distribute-list route-map OSPF_TO_EIGRP in Redistribute eigrp 1 subnets tag 900 ( in R10 Redistribute eigrp 1 subnets tag 1000 ) ! -> I Redistributed from OSPF to EIGRP tag the routes ( Tag 900 and 1000 ) and when I redistributed back to eigrp I used a route-map to deny both Tag 900 and 1000 but the optimal path still occurs then I used a distribute-list in OSPF filter the routes with tag 900 and 1000 be installed on RIB ( routes that were learned via EIGRP ) with this, both R9 and R10 install the path via EIGRP but there is no redundancy in case of failure. I'm going to take the exam soon and I really appreciate if you could share what you've done to solve this part. Once again congrats and enjoy your number!
  10. @fearless, I'm also using this solution to solve this ticket i believe the both are corrects once the workbook says that we should legit the packets, and if I'm not wrong even if you don't put the class class-default when you type "show policy map control-plane" CLI will show class-map default in the end of output but I'm not sure.
  11. Hi Zizko, Thanks for participate , I have to agree with you good point. It cleared my doubts.
  12. Hi Guys, I would highlight one point in configuration showed about the section 2.2 + 3.1 ( OSPF + DMVPN ) I checked the Tunnel interfaces configuration where OSPF network types is Point-to-Multipoint, but theres as trick here based on the task requested. On Section 3.1 says: * Ensure that spoke‐to‐spoke traffic does not transit via the hub. Based on OSPF point-to-multpoint design even if the NHRP is configure to redirect and shortcut ( DMVPN Phase 3 ) the control-plane will be instructed to install path via R17 broken the requested per task, at least in DMVPN phase 3 the first packet will be send via R17 the other ones after NHRP had concluded the rewrite will follow directly between spokes. I mean If you use point-to-multipoint network type + DMVPN Phase 3, the first packets, will flow through the hub router. ( Short Example Below Tunnel configured OSPF Point-to-Multipoint ). R19#sh ip route 10.255.1.20 <<<< Routing entry for 10.255.1.20/32 Known via "ospf 65002", distance 110, metric 2001, type intra area Last update from 10.100.0.1 on Tunnel0, 00:01:18 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 10.100.0.1, from 10.255.1.20, 00:01:18 ago, via Tunnel0 <<<< Next-hop via R17 Route metric is 2001, traffic share count is 1 R19# # SH IP ROUTE FROM R19 R19#sh ip route ospf | b Gateway Gateway of last resort is 10.100.0.1 to network 0.0.0.0 O*IA 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1001] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 2 masks O 10.16.2.0/24 [110/2010] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 O 10.16.3.0/24 [110/2010] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 O 10.100.0.1/32 [110/1000] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 O % 10.100.0.20/32 [110/2000] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 <<< Routes override , next-hop router point to Hub Router R17 O % 10.100.0.21/32 [110/2000] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 O % 10.255.1.20/32 [110/2001] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 O % 10.255.1.21/32 [110/2001] via 10.100.0.1, 00:02:17, Tunnel0 R19# R19#sh ip nhrp 10.100.0.1/32 via 10.100.0.1 Tunnel0 created 00:05:09, never expire Type: static, Flags: used NBMA address: 192.0.2.2 10.100.0.19/32 via 10.100.0.19 Tunnel0 created 00:00:07, expire 00:04:52 Type: dynamic, Flags: router unique local NBMA address: 192.0.2.10 (no-socket) 10.100.0.20/32 via 10.100.0.20 Tunnel0 created 00:00:15, expire 00:04:44 Type: dynamic, Flags: router nhop rib nho <<<<<<<<< NBMA address: 192.0.2.11 R19#traceroute 10.255.1.20 <<<<< Two hops to reach the Spoke Router. Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.255.1.20 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 * * * 2 10.100.0.20 6 msec * 5 msec R19# I believe another point in text that it worth mention is: Sec 2.2 * None of the branch routers may attempt to elect a Designated Router on their Tunnel0 interface. As quickly reminder OSPF DR and BDR election just are done on Broadcast and Non-Broadcast network. I did the same test using OSPF network type Broadcast and result are different from the previous one as follow below: R19#sh ip route ospf Gateway of last resort is 10.100.0.1 to network 0.0.0.0 O*IA 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1001] via 10.100.0.1, 00:00:37, Tunnel0 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 9 subnets, 2 masks O 10.16.2.0/24 [110/1010] via 10.100.0.20, 00:00:37, Tunnel0 <<<<<<<<< Next Hop Point to Spoke Router O 10.16.3.0/24 [110/1010] via 10.100.0.21, 00:00:37, Tunnel0 <<<<<<<<< Next Hop Point to Spoke Router O 10.255.1.20/32 [110/1001] via 10.100.0.20, 00:00:37, Tunnel0 <<<<<<<<< Next Hop Point to Spoke Router O 10.255.1.21/32 [110/1001] via 10.100.0.21, 00:00:37, Tunnel0 <<<<<<<<< Next Hop Point to Spoke Router R19# R19#sh ip route 10.255.1.20 Routing entry for 10.255.1.20/32 Known via "ospf 65002", distance 110, metric 1001, type intra area Last update from 10.100.0.20 on Tunnel0, 00:02:44 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 10.100.0.20, from 10.255.1.20, 00:02:44 ago, via Tunnel0 <<<< Next-hop directly to R20 spoke router. Route metric is 1001, traffic share count is 1 R19# R19#traceroute 10.255.1.20 <<<<<< One hop to reach R20 Spoke Router Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.255.1.20 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.100.0.20 5 msec * 5 msec R19# R19#sh ip nhrp 10.100.0.1/32 via 10.100.0.1 Tunnel0 created 00:21:35, never expire Type: static, Flags: used NBMA address: 192.0.2.2 10.100.0.19/32 via 10.100.0.19 Tunnel0 created 00:04:01, expire 00:04:30 Type: dynamic, Flags: router unique local NBMA address: 192.0.2.10 (no-socket) 10.100.0.20/32 via 10.100.0.20 Tunnel0 created 00:04:01, expire 00:04:30 Type: dynamic, Flags: router used nhop <<<<< Router is not using Override. NBMA address: 192.0.2.11 I hope it helps , please share what you guys think is the best solution. Let's keep working to reach the best solution to all.
  13. Hey Man, I must study the A5/H2 , as already mentioned a I never heard someone getting the same section again, I believe it was the reason there were 2 Labs ( With VRF and Without VRF ) to try differentiate the both tests.
  14. Hi arshtabbu, I had the same problem, but after disable IP CEF in SW3 it started working correctly. I believe this might be any kind of limitation in the IOS virtual image customize for this LAB.
×
×
  • Create New...