Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About georgemonier1982

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. Guys check this one here it has the new spoto 202 + 6 new question [Hidden Content]
  2. Hello Guys .........I just got my number back !!!!!!..............passed with 9XX !!!! spoto 202 and spoto 228 are valid but 202 is more important , but take care as I think there are some wrong answers in 202 I will try to send the correction that I think are right . Thank you all for your help see you after 2 years
  3. (Item 27 , Q 104 ) Which two protocols exclude the source and destination IP address from the application data stream A.TFTP B.NTP C.SMTP D.SSH E.SNMP In the Dumps it is NTP and SMTP (B,C) . I have checked the link below it should be TFTP and NTP as SMTP does embed the IP address in the payload [Hidden Content]
  4. Hello Guys ........... I have passed on the 22nd on Nov and the 65 are still valid .............thank you all for your help .
  5. Hello All , I have passed yesterday JNCIS-SEC yesterday with 90% . Below are the material used 1- Fast track 2- Used vSRX to practice the commands 3- Junos Genius app 4- Actuall Test 490Q More than half of the question I have not seen them before so braindumps are never enough ! , so you have to study and understand so you can pass .
  6. Hello Guys , I should go for the JNCIS-SEC test within the next 2 weeks , can anybody who went to the test lately share his experience ?
  7. Has anybody passed the test lately so he can share his experience ?
  8. I guess you have to try those guys [Hidden Content] They are the best compromise between price , devices and support
  9. Hello AM80 , In all cases whether it was R7 and R8 or R1 and R2 are acting as route reflectors for IPv4 and IPv6 you must use next-hop-self . As it was strictly stated that links between the 2 ASs are not to be advertised in the IGP .
  10. Hello All , For lab 3.2 the Sanjia doc states that we need to have set the SoO for the Site 1 and 3 on BGP and EIGRP . Problem is that when every the link between goes down they will not be able to reach each other . Anybody tried it ?
  11. This should be related to the fact that the IPV4 address in the network are label switched (using ldp ). Where as the IPv6 address are not label switched
  12. Hello All , I Can see a diff between Snajia doc and CCIE_cert in section 3.5 . In the doc it says that you have to enable eigrp on R9 and R10 and in the Cert it says only enable EIGRP on R9 ................not sure which one is the correct ?
  13. Try to peer your vnpv6 family with the IPv4 address of R2 not the IPv6 address . address-family vpnv6 neighbor activate neighbor send-community extended exit-address-family
  14. Hello Guys , I am having a problem with lab 3.2 section 3.4 . I am using IOU for now and I am trying to redistribute BGP routes into ipv6 eigrp on R3 but it never shows up in the topology table R3#sh ipv6 route vrf ABC bgp IPv6 Routing Table - ABC - 14 entries Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static route B - BGP, M - MIPv6, R - RIP, I1 - ISIS L1 I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea, IS - ISIS summary, D - EIGRP EX - EIGRP external, ND - Neighbor Discovery O - OSPF Intra, OI - OSPF Inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2 ON1 - OSPF NSSA ext 1, ON2 - OSPF NSSA ext 2 B 2002:172:9::2/128 [200/0] via, indirectly connected B 2002:172:9::6/128 [200/0] via, indirectly connected B 2002:172:9::13/128 [200/10] via, indirectly connected B 2002:172:9::14/128 [200/0] via, indirectly connected B 2002:172:9:134::/64 [200/0] via, indirectly connected<<<<<<--------------------- BGP routes are showing up in the vrf Table R3# R3# R3# R3# R3#scb | sec address-family ipv6 vrf ABC address-family ipv6 vrf ABC redistribute eigrp 100 include-connected no synchronization network 2002:172:9::3/128 R3# R3# R3# R3# R3# R3#sc | sec eigrp router eigrp ABC ! address-family ipv6 unicast vrf ABC autonomous-system 100 ! topology base redistribute bgp 9 metric 10000 1000 255 10 1500<<<<------------- redistribution of routes under IPV6 vrf ABC eigrp exit-af-topology exit-address-family ============================================================================ R3#sh eigrp address-family ipv6 vrf ABC topology EIGRP-IPv6 VR(ABC) Topology Table for AS(100)/ID( Topology(base) TID(0) VRF(ABC) Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply, r - reply Status, s - sia Status P 2002:172:9::11/128, 1 successors, FD is 409600 via FE80::A8BB:CCFF:FE00:B20 (409600/128256), Ethernet0/3 P 2002:172:9::12/128, 1 successors, FD is 435200 via FE80::A8BB:CCFF:FE00:B20 (435200/409600), Ethernet0/3 P 2002:172:9::3/128, 1 successors, FD is 128256 via Connected, Loopback1 P 2002:172:9:113::/64, 1 successors, FD is 281600 via Connected, Ethernet0/3 P 2002:172:9:112::/64, 1 successors, FD is 307200 via FE80::A8BB:CCFF:FE00:B20 (307200/281600), Ethernet0/3 P 2002::3/128, 1 successors, FD is 128256 via Connected, Loopback100 ============================================================================ Appricaite if any body can help
  • Create New...