Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'CCIE SP'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
    • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • CERTIFICATION - - - - - NO REQUESTS IN THESE FORUMS - - - - -
    • CISCO SYSTEMS
    • COMPTIA
    • LINUX
    • MICROSOFT
    • ORACLE
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    • SECURITY CERTIFICATIONS
    • SUN MICROSYSTEMS
    • WIRELESS
    • OTHER CERTIFICATIONS
  • CISCO TECHNICAL SECTION
    • CISCO LABS
    • GNS3
    • NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
    • SECURITY
    • WIRELESS
    • SERVICE PROVIDERS
    • COLLABORATION, VOICE AND VIDEO
    • DATA CENTER
    • SMALL BUSINESS
  • MICROSOFT TECHNICAL SECTION
  • OTHER TECHNICAL SECTION
  • TRAINING OFFERS & REQUESTS
  • CERTCOLLECTION MALL
  • GENERAL FORUMS
  • COMMUNITY CENTER

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 115 results

  1. Hi looking for a buddie I am not in any big rush to do the exam but am hoping to be ready in 6 months or less, I have started just been watching the INE SP vids, now i would like to work with someone buddie up to stay focused and work with someone to stay motivated and help each other as we go along. If you are serious please reply, if you are just going to turn up one day disappear for month pls do not reply, or if you are going to start a group and then disappear once you have got what you need out of it pls do not reply. Genuine people only who will be regularly on skype, whatapp etc any skill level welcome, i myself am ccnp in R&S so im ok with most things but still have a lot to learn. '' PLEASE NO TRAINERs WHO GET ME A PASS IN 2 MONTHS and i dont care how many 100s of people you have passed '' !!!! Unfortunately there are a lot of crooks and thieves operating on the forum i have wasted 1000 USD with an idiot who was supposed to teach me '' CCIE R&S from the ground up and have me ready for the lab in 6 months? '' (his words not mine) hes taken the money and disappeared. You live and learn m
  2. Hi Everyone, IS anyone working or have gone through the INE workbook lab 4.7 ? I am struggling with the available diagrams for the same as none of them match to the required topology ? Thanks
  3. Hello , Anyone would like to share SPv4 INE ( Including expended lab/Challenge lab ) workbook or Cisco CCIE SP v4.1 update . Any luck ?
  4. Guys, I am planning to make a study group for those who are planning to take a CCIE-SP lab between Dec 2018 to feb 2019. if anyone interested to explore the content collectively and share knowledge pm me the skype ID. do not share skype ID's below. thanks.
  5. Howmasterthis

    PASSSPLABS

    Hi guys, Anyone buy from PASSSPLABS? what is your opinion about their policy?? thanks alot
  6. Dear All, Is there any active group for CCIE SP Lab ? I have done for Written and actively looking for Lab group . Thank You
  7. Hi mates, Does anyone have videos of INE's CCIE SP v4 training? Don't offer SPv3
  8. Hello folks Could someone kindly share this course [Hidden Content]
  9. vishnin

    CCIE SP v5

    CCIE SP would be changing to SPCORE from 24 Feb 2020. For more information visit : [Hidden Content]
  10. Hello, can any one upload last two parts of CCIE SP V4 videos of INE [Hidden Content] Multicast VPN Multicast VPN Overview Multicast VPN Configuration Multicast VPN Verification Multicast VPN Optimization Mpls QOS MPLS QoS Overview MPLS QoS Configuration Thanks in advance
  11. Welcome to the CCIE SP v4.1 Study Group If you are preparing for CCIE SP v4.1. Join me!
  12. HI Friends, I am a Cisco Guy use INE Rack for my Lab and Certifications. I have quite Rack rental token with me which i am no longer using.. So i through of selling it out with a discount offer.. Please pm for more details.. Thanks
  13. lhawks

    CCIE SP v4.1Lab

    Hello, SP v4.1 Lab is more about technologies now and less about typing. If you preparing for the exam Nick Russo book is still more then enough. I would recommend you to spend more time practising different scenarios from this book. The only part is missing there - few mVPN profiles with partitioned MDT(as far as I remember). Not sure if Segment Routing was added during last change or earlier, but it is now a part of the lab exam. Groups and templates good to know, but I didn't have any useful tasks for this, in 4.0 there was a task with configuration of ~10-12 peers for inter-as, this time task was much simpler, reconfiguration of few adj. One strange thing for me - tasks where you can check only control plane(mVPN/L2VPNs). Almost everything from blue print could be there, so spend enough time on the technologies from part 4 and 5, I think people usually underestimate these parts. Best plan if you want to become a CCIE is still in this post [Hidden Content]. I've failed and not the first time, but right now exam is much better and fair.
  14. Hi Guys, If you are going for SPv4 lab before 21 st June ( Before Version change ) .Please PM me your Skype ID. We can form a study group and crack this together.
  15. Hi!!! First, I really appreciate all the information, feedback and simulators provided on this forum! The exam was the 3.2 same as Sanjana. Herer are a little tips that I hope can help somebody to take this exam in this days: Relax, don’t be stressed. That is the key difference to perfectly read, understand what are you doing and what you did on previous steps. Sec1. Some devices with different OSPF area, interfaces with point-to-point, etc… OSPFv3: Some interfaces included on different area or not added to run OSPFv3 ISIS: Some devices with different net id, interfaces with isis circuit type, or isis protocol shutdown are the causes of establishing the adjacency (You must verify that all the devices have IPv4 metric-style wide and ipv6 multi-topology) BFD: No changes OSPFv3: No changes IBGP and EBGP without changes. Try to follow the order proposed by Sanjana, that can make the next steps easier to configure: o Configure at same time the BGP IPv4, IPv6 and VPNv6 adjacency between XR1 and XR2. o Configure at same time the BGP IPv4, VPNv4 adjacencies and local preference on R7 and R8 o Fix little issues between this RR with their clients once you reach the specific section for that. I.E. 3.1 VPNv4 Tshoot: You already configured the EBGP peering between both AS and you only need to double check that configuration and fix the adjacency with the RR-clients MPLS TE and backup: No changes PIM / SM RP / MSDP: No changes, but verify that you remove PIM of the Serial interfaces between R5 – R21 and R6 – R22 Section 2: No changes. o On the Sec 1 they requested to configure the AS 1009 as Level-2 but not specify to configure is-type under router ISIS or the interfaces, only with the different NET ID of each device is enough to see the routes as L2. o With that in mind, you only need to configure R20 as L1, add the metric-style wide, IPv6 multi-topology and ignore-attached-bit. o They requested to have full IPv4 and IPv6 reachability (not only loopback interfaces) o On R9 I redistributed the L2 routes with a route-map matching that type of routes and the IPv6 prefix list ::/0 le 128 Sec 3 No changes. o Read each question carefully. Look what they are requesting. I.E: 3.4: Intra AS VPNv4: Configure OSPF on R13 and R14 on the interface that are shown in the table (table includes the Lo0 and Eth between them) but sometimes the Lo0 is preconfigured under BGP address family IPv4 / IPv6, etc. In that cases I removed it from BGP and configured it under the protocol that they asked. o Take care with the redistribute connected on the PEs and CEs. I configured in same way as Sanjana suggested. Other way it’s possible that you can’t reach some interface between this devices. Make tests on your simulator to verify what happens if you don’t configure some redistribute connect, how you can notice that missing command during the exam, etc. o I used SOO, tag and ip vrf sitemap same as Sanjana o There is no need to configure on all the routers the “no bgp default route-target filter”. I have my doubts about that because it’s preconfigured in some devices. Then I removed it from all the devices and worked without issues. CSC. No changes. Intra AS Multicast VPN. No changes. o After multiple tries, I never figured out how to make it work on my IOL. I always had some unreachable device, but in the lab worked with the exact configuration without any double check. The four CEs devices were reachable at first try! Sec 4. HDLC over MPLS. No changes. Only verify if they are requesting PPP or HDLC connection Frame relay and PPP. No changes. There is a topology map about the DLCI and interfaces to be used. Even there is no need to enable CDP to look for the interfaces. VPLS. No changes. I tried it multiple times in IOL without establishing the connection between both switches. Even I tried on rack rentals without success (I thought was because one of the switches wasn’t a metro and I can’t configure the port-type nni). On the lab both switches are metro, but even I can reach the XRs through an ping mpls pseudowires, both switches stayed as root bridge for the VLAN 123. When you reach this question, be careful on what are you changing on this switches, because in my desperation I started to shut down some ports and after that I noticed that some of my core devices started to lost his adjacencies with multiple devices Fortunately I was able to recover that adjacencies and double checked each question from the beginning verifying to fulfill the requests. I hope this little post can be useful for future candidates. And remember: It’s the journey, not the destination! My best wishes to all!
  16. Hi Every one, am unable to book CCIE SP LAB V 3.0 , can anyone want to unblock the allocated seat and help me I can transfer the money for them PM me immediately Thanks, Raja.
  17. Hello Guys, I am very happy to share with you than finally the road for the CCIE SP its ended. My english is normal, so hope than you can understand everything than I said. First of all I give the thanks to God, family, and Sanjana documents, all the forum inputs really helps a lot. About the preparation, I just started with the INE videos, and the workbooks, and theory at all, that was around 4 or 5 months of study, that helps a lot to get knowledge and velocity in your hands. You need a good keyboard, mouse, and a monitor, and 8 or more GB RAM. So after training with that practice a lot with the Sanjana docs 3.1 and 3.2. I told you guys i practice a lot, haha, and make a notebook with your progress measuring your time, your faults, and your weakness. In the beginning when I pass 2 or 3 hours I was really tired, but with practice and more practice my body and mind could being prepared for that and supere it, remember than in the exam you might be in front a PC around 8 hours haha. So in total I did the v3.2 around 15 times, and the v3.1 3 times hahhahaha. Well lets talk about the exam I try to put all the inputs than I remember. It was the v3.2 and basically all similar to the expected. I only use the GNS3 in my preparation I heard about IOU but honestly i dont like it, and I didnt have time to prepare the entire topology on it, so for me GNS3 was ok. 1) About the IGPS be carefull with OSPF, check it out the correct router IDS, and look the RIB in every router, I see a fault for example than some router advertise a prefix with IA with is not expeected, so I verify it and quit it and perfect. 2) In ISIS be carefull, because IN sanjana docs, said than you must been configure ISIS level 2 but in the exam they didnt ask you that, well in my case for example, so verify your question carefully. 3) Both cores are with RP statics, so fix that, and quite them and jus announce the BSR as is requerired. 4) With TE protection backup, I just use autorute and thats it, and check it out in th XR the fast reroute database ready thats it. 5) About part 4 and 2 no news everything as expected. 6) In the CSC remember in RIP put a metric with number, DONT USE TRANSPARENT, the solution didnt works with that!!! 7) Something strange happens to me in the intra as multicast vpn, i configure all as expected and the solution doesnt works, so I went to lunch, and relax the mind, and I just figure out some idea haha. I just delete the multicast and pim configurations from xr3 y xr4 and reconfig again them, and... Tarannn works!!!! So that works in my case, and site 1 and 2 have full intra multicast vpn connection without problems!! 8) In my case I didnt have any HW issue, in any device but If you have one just tell it to the proctor to fix it out. Those are all the inputs than I remember I tried to been very specific because all the inputs from this forum helps me a lot!! If do you have any question please dont dude in ask me I will try to answer and help to every one. Best regards, Chinese.
  18. Hi Guys! Anyone could share this amazing book? IP Routing on Cisco IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR: An Essential Guide to Understanding and Implementing IP Routing Protocols Thanks!! Kind regards
  19. Hi all, i'm in trouble with this task. After complete the configuration, R11 and R12 are unable to ping R13 lo0 (and vice-versa). Please, help me to understand. R11#show ip route | i 172.9.0 172.9.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 22 subnets, 2 masks B 172.9.0.1/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 B 172.9.0.2/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 B 172.9.0.3/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:48 B 172.9.0.4/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 O 172.9.0.5/32 [110/21] via 172.9.112.12, 00:09:09, Ethernet0/1 B 172.9.0.6/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 B 172.9.0.9/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 B 172.9.0.10/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 C 172.9.0.11/32 is directly connected, Loopback0 O 172.9.0.12/32 [110/11] via 172.9.112.12, 00:21:07, Ethernet0/1 B 172.9.0.13/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 B 172.9.0.14/32 [20/0] via 172.9.113.3, 00:09:08 R12#show ip route | i 172.9.0 172.9.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 21 subnets, 2 masks O E1 172.9.0.1/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:13:59, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.2/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:13:59, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.3/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:09:17, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.4/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:09:22, Ethernet0/3 O 172.9.0.5/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:14:42, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.6/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:13:59, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.9/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:13:59, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.10/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:13:59, Ethernet0/3 O 172.9.0.11/32 [110/11] via 172.9.112.11, 00:21:21, Ethernet0/1 C 172.9.0.12/32 is directly connected, Loopback0 O E1 172.9.0.13/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:09:23, Ethernet0/3 O E1 172.9.0.14/32 [110/11] via 172.9.125.5, 00:13:59, Ethernet0/3 R13#show ip route | i 172.9.0 172.9.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 22 subnets, 2 masks B 172.9.0.1/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.2/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.3/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:19 B 172.9.0.4/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:36 B 172.9.0.5/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.6/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.9/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.10/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.11/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 B 172.9.0.12/32 [20/0] via 172.9.134.4, 00:09:29 C 172.9.0.13/32 is directly connected, Loopback0 O 172.9.0.14/32 [110/11] via 172.9.34.14, 00:37:18, Ethernet1/1 R14#show ip route | i 172.9.0 172.9.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 21 subnets, 2 masks B 172.9.0.1/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:27:38 B 172.9.0.2/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:27:38 B 172.9.0.3/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:09:22 B 172.9.0.4/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:09:27 B 172.9.0.5/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:27:38 B 172.9.0.6/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:27:38 B 172.9.0.9/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:27:38 B 172.9.0.10/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:27:38 B 172.9.0.11/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:13:07 B 172.9.0.12/32 [20/0] via 172.9.146.6, 00:13:07 O 172.9.0.13/32 [110/11] via 172.9.34.13, 00:32:25, Ethernet1/1 C 172.9.0.14/32 is directly connected, Loopback0 R11#ping 172.9.0.12 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.12, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.11 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms R11#ping 172.9.0.13 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.13, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.11 ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) R11#ping 172.9.0.14 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.14, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.11 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms R12#ping 172.9.0.11 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.11, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.12 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms R12#ping 172.9.0.13 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.13, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.12 ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) R12#ping 172.9.0.14 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.14, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.12 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms R13#ping 172.9.0.11 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.11, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.13 ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) R13#ping 172.9.0.12 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.12, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.13 ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) R13#ping 172.9.0.14 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.14, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.13 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms R14#ping 172.9.0.11 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.11, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.14 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/6/20 ms R14#ping 172.9.0.12 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.12, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.14 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms R14#ping 172.9.0.13 source lo0 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.9.0.13, timeout is 2 seconds: Packet sent with a source address of 172.9.0.14 !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
  20. Hi Folks. I am currently preparing for CCIE SP exam and as usual I perform lots of labbing. As part of my preparation I decided to create and share with you some random lab scenario. This scenario was invented solely by myself and it is not the scenario that you can get on actual lab exam. This scenario can test you on these: ISIS v4 OSPFv2/OSPFv3 RIP/RIPng EIGRP v4/v6, EIGRP prefix filtering MPLS TE, Tunnel mesh groups, autoroute announce VRF aware LDP MPLS L3VPN, 6VPE CSC, Inter-AS VPN option-B, some sort of Inter-AS option-C BGP RR, BGP as-override, BGP remove private AS, AS-path replace, BGP labeled unicast Multicast PIM-SM, PIM-SSM, BSR, BGP MDT, MSDP mesh groups, ISIS multicast intact Hierarchical (on top of CSC) Inter-AS Multicast VPN with Rosen-GRE (aka Profile 0) Solutions provided (I solved the lab by myself and can assure you that everithing is working fine), I believe that it would be great to discuss solutions with you. So, I hope you will like it, and I also would like to receive from you some feedback about the quality of questions, topology, topics etc. Enjoy. Initial configs could be found here: [Hidden Content] Scenario 1 v.1.pdf
  21. Hi Folks. I am currently preparing for CCIE SP exam and as usual I perform lots of labbing. As part of my preparation I decided to create and share with you some random lab scenario. This scenario was invented solely by myself and it is not the scenario that you can get on actual lab exam. This scenario can test you on this: ISIS v4 OSPFv2/OSPFv3 RIP/RIPng EIGRP v4/v6, EIGRP prefix filtering MPLS TE, Tunnel mesh groups, autoroute announce VRF aware LDP MPLS L3VPN, 6VPE CSC, Inter-AS VPN option-B, some sort of Inter-AS option-C BGP RR, BGP as-override, BGP remove private AS, AS-path replace, BGP labeled unicast Multicast PIM-SM, PIM-SSM, BSR, BGP MDT, MSDP mesh groups, ISIS multicast intact Hierarchical (on top of CSC) Inter-AS Multicast VPN with Rosen-GRE (aka Profile 0) No solutions provided (I solved the lab by myself and can assure you that everithing is working fine), I believe that it would great to discuss solutions with you. So, I hope you will like it, and I also would like to receive from you some feedback about the quality of questions, topology, topics etc. Enjoy. Scenario 1 v.0.pdf
  22. Hi all, My friend ( a guy in 4 guys in his group) passed CCIE SP lab 3.2 LAB in Sydney few days ago. They got 3.2 lab and all question exactly as Sanajia 3.2. Only a issue : - In VPLS question: STP didnt work, but when He create a interface vlan 123 and assigned a IP and tested with ping, it is okay. He used debugging and saw the switch getting BPDU packet but didn't understand why STP dont work. Thanks
  23. Hi All, Is there anyone could help to share the INE CCIE SP Initial Configuration for Full Lab 3 & 4? Thank you, Hendra
  24. Hi Guys, I am planning to give exam at the end of January. I have just finished preparing INE WB. I have found materials from Sanajana DOC in the forum , The one mentioned LAB 2 updated in 2014. Please can you provide your experience , People who passed and how they go , What exam came in the lab.
×
×
  • Create New...