Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'CCIE SP'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
    • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • CERTIFICATION - - - - - NO REQUESTS IN THESE FORUMS - - - - -
    • CISCO SYSTEMS
    • COMPTIA
    • LINUX
    • MICROSOFT
    • ORACLE
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    • SECURITY CERTIFICATIONS
    • SUN MICROSYSTEMS
    • WIRELESS
    • OTHER CERTIFICATIONS
  • CISCO TECHNICAL SECTION
    • CISCO LABS
    • GNS3
    • NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
    • SECURITY
    • WIRELESS
    • SERVICE PROVIDERS
    • COLLABORATION, VOICE AND VIDEO
    • DATA CENTER
    • SMALL BUSINESS
  • MICROSOFT TECHNICAL SECTION
  • OTHER TECHNICAL SECTION
  • TRAINING OFFERS & REQUESTS
  • CERTCOLLECTION MALL
  • GENERAL FORUMS
  • COMMUNITY CENTER

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 115 results

  1. I am facing this strange behavior when applying the MDT configuration a problem occurs with the vpnv4 advertising no MDT configuration on R5 or R6 R7#sho bgp vpnv4 uni al summary Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 9.9.0.2 4 9 64 103 55 0 0 00:52:36 1 9.9.0.3 4 9 68 104 55 0 0 00:52:40 2 9.9.0.4 4 9 64 103 55 0 0 00:52:34 4 9.9.0.5 4 9 89 103 55 0 0 00:52:47 5 9.9.0.6 4 9 76 103 55 0 0 00:52:47 5 9.9.78.8 4 1009 76 89 55 0 0 00:52:47 19 After add MDT configuration on R5 and R6 -- clear bgp vpnv4 uni * on R7 Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 9.9.0.2 4 9 13 34 33 0 0 00:01:28 1 9.9.0.3 4 9 15 34 33 0 0 00:01:28 7 9.9.0.4 4 9 13 34 33 0 0 00:01:28 5 9.9.0.5 4 9 12 35 33 0 0 00:01:36 0 9.9.0.6 4 9 12 34 33 0 0 00:01:36 0 9.9.78.8 4 1009 19 20 33 0 0 00:01:36 19 After remove MDT configuration Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 9.9.0.2 4 9 16 44 42 0 0 00:04:37 1 9.9.0.3 4 9 19 44 42 0 0 00:04:37 2 9.9.0.4 4 9 16 44 42 0 0 00:04:37 4 9.9.0.5 4 9 20 45 42 0 0 00:04:44 5 9.9.0.6 4 9 18 44 42 0 0 00:04:45 5 9.9.78.8 4 1009 22 30 42 0 0 00:04:45 19 no MDT and clear R7 bgp vpnv4 Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 9.9.0.2 4 9 12 34 36 0 0 00:00:07 1 9.9.0.3 4 9 13 35 36 0 0 00:00:12 2 9.9.0.4 4 9 12 35 36 0 0 00:00:09 4 9.9.0.5 4 9 11 36 36 0 0 00:00:20 5 9.9.0.6 4 9 11 35 36 0 0 00:00:20 5 9.9.78.8 4 1009 17 18 36 0 0 00:00:21 19
  2. Hi Guys In the Sanjana document, in section 1.2 its mentioned like this OSPF for IPV6 routing on routers in AS9 have been configured for the interconnect and Loopback 0 interfaces (table will be given there). R2,R7,R3,R4 interconnect links and lo0 are in area 0 R3-R5 link , R4-R6 link and R5 /R6 lo0 are in area 1 Is it R5-R6 link which is in area 1 ?? because when i configure R4-R6 link in area 1 it becomes a disconnected area and i stop receiving the loopback 0 route of R5 via R4 Please advise
  3. Guys, in Lab 1 or 2, i can always test successfully MCAST VPN pings from R11 and R12 towards R13 and 14, but never in the opposite way.... I am using Xr4u virtual machine with IOL (just one VM). Does anyone have this same behaviour ? thanks !
  4. Dear, Could you please share this labs ?? or where i can find them ??
  5. Hello Everyone, I want to attempt CCIE SP written exam but i heard that 15 to 20 questions are out of dumps. Only lead2pass have recently update their dumps.Kindly help me. Thanks in advance.
  6. ehsnsbn

    site 3 loop

    hello dear all, in my rack practices, i get loop on EIGRP site 3 if i don't configure tagging and filtering on R9 and R10! the loop description is as below: 1- i configure R9 with EIGRP VRF and mutual redistribution! 2- i configure R10 with EIGRP VRF and mutual redistribution! 3- i configure R15 (or R17 in v3.1) 4- i configure R16 (or R18 in v3.1) when it is finished, randomly R9 or R10 select the remote sites (1,2) from another local PE (R10 if we stand on R9/R9 if stand on R10) and redistribute it back to BGP VPNv4! i think the reason is that, site 1,2 are OSPF/BGP VRF and we don't receive cost community for those sites on R9/R10 or am i missing something? do prevent this loop i used tagging and distribute-list on R9/R10! please advice: r9: en conf t route-map set-tag per 10 set tag 1009 ! route-map deny-tag deny 10 match tag 1009 ! route-map deny-tag per 20 ! router ei 1009 add ipv4 vrf ABC auto 100 no auto- net 172.9.0.0 0.0.255.255 redis bgp 1009 metric 100000 100 255 1 1500 route-map set-tag distribute-list route-map deny-tag in ! inter e 1/0 mpls ip no shut ! router bgp 1009 add ipv4 vrf ABC redis ei 100 ! r10: en conf t route-map set-tag per 10 set tag 1009 ! route-map deny-tag deny 10 match tag 1009 ! route-map deny-tag per 20 ! router ei 1009 add ipv4 vrf ABC auto 100 no auto- net 172.9.0.0 0.0.255.255 redis bgp 1009 metric 100000 100 255 1 1500 route-map set-tag distribute-list route-map deny-tag in ! inter e 1/0 mpls ip no shut ! router bgp 1009 add ipv4 vrf ABC redis ei 100 !
  7. Hi Guys Was preparing the INE WB for Service Provider and in the Full Scale Lab there are lot of tasks related to switching like STP, Private VLAN etc. Please let me know whether in the real lab also they used to give switching tasks??
  8. kushal

    MSDP Question !!!

    Hi All, Was going through SanjanaIE document and found that we have access-list configured for msdp question. int Serial2/1 ip pim bsr-border access-list 25 permit 239.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 ip pim bsr-candidate loopback 0 ip pim rp-candidate loopback 0 group-list 25 Can anyone help me understand the need of access-list here. I tried configuring the access-list , but did'nt obsereved any difference in the output. I normally do not configure ACL here and have everythibg pining from both AS. Please help !!! Regards Kushal
  9. Hi All, Wanted to check if anyone else has came across a similar issues where ISIS is stuck in INT state due to MTU mismatch issue. However the strange part here is, I do not have any MTU configured on the device or the link on both the sides. The connection I have is between XR and IOS devices over gig link. ISIS adjacency is not formed until I manually configure MTU on both sides of the link. Per my understanding such issue should not ideally happen if I do not have MTU configured. Anyone else faced it ?? Any other recommended solution ? Regards Kushal
  10. Hi I have made a video tutorial for how to easy add Cisco IOS XR in GNS3 with Ethernet and Console support [Hidden Content]
  11. Currently looking for Narbiks Advanced CCIE SPv3 workbook.
  12. Dubai is open quickly seats are limited
  13. Hi Guys Could you please confirm this diagram, please check the R9 and R10 and their connected routers. Regards
  14. Hi All Did anybody face issue with the IPv4 EBGP peering between R1 & R2. For me in WEB-IOU the peering goes down frequently and comes up only when i remove and reconfigure the static route for neighbor /32 ip. Is this a bug.. Did anyone faced similar issues in real lab ???
×
×
  • Create New...