Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'CCIE RnS'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
    • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • CERTIFICATION - - - - - NO REQUESTS IN THESE FORUMS - - - - -
    • CISCO SYSTEMS
    • COMPTIA
    • LINUX
    • MICROSOFT
    • ORACLE
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    • SECURITY CERTIFICATIONS
    • SUN MICROSYSTEMS
    • WIRELESS
    • OTHER CERTIFICATIONS
  • CISCO TECHNICAL SECTION
    • CISCO LABS
    • GNS3
    • NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
    • SECURITY
    • WIRELESS
    • SERVICE PROVIDERS
    • COLLABORATION, VOICE AND VIDEO
    • DATA CENTER
    • SMALL BUSINESS
  • MICROSOFT TECHNICAL SECTION
  • OTHER TECHNICAL SECTION
  • TRAINING OFFERS & REQUESTS
  • CERTCOLLECTION MALL
  • GENERAL FORUMS
  • COMMUNITY CENTER

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 9 results

  1. Some Misc CCIE Collections.. Hope you like the Content. [Hidden Content] Thank you.
  2. Dear all, Kindly support to provide the link of the updated version of SPOTO RnS Lab, many passed using SPOTO but i didn't find the updated version under share folders. Thanks in advance.
  3. I passed my lab today. Thanks to all the people who have contributed on this forum..It has been very helpful Many thanks to Guru2010 and pravine for their wonderful work......... My lab experience This was my 2nd attempt in V5. Config lab:- Same as shared by guru with no VRF Diagnostics:- Same as simon PDF Tshoot:- 1.Layer 2:- Acess vlan wrong 2.PPP:- PPP ipcp default missing on r17 3.Loadbalnce OSPF:- Max-mteric on R5 4.EIgrp:- bandwidt command and metric weight 5.Trace to internet:- Metric R-21 route map 6.IPv6 :- Next hop wrong in route-map 7.DMVPN:- R-15 redistribute connected nhrp shorcut missing on spokes 8. MPLS traceroute:- The most tricky of all. They have asked for traceroute from one branch to other and to internet from one bracnh I had 5 faults in this ticket. 1.Deafult originate missing on r10 in OSPF 2.Default orginate mssing on r7 in BGP 3.Nat outside on e0/0.125 on R7 and R8 I thought i resolved but out of curiousity i wanted to test failover by shutting R7....And to my surprise it didnt work... then found 2 more faults. 4.MPLS label switching issue as R4 didnt have mpls label generated for R6.R6 and R4 were learning each other route via eth 0/2 which didnt have MPLS IP.this results in failover for R7 not working. Basically i increased the cost on e0/2 so that routes get learned on MPLS enabled interface. 5.Int eth 0/0.123 and eth 0/0.124 ips on R4 not addvertised in their VRf. Once i fixed above 2 , failover worked fine... 9:- DMVPN Nat traversal disabled Ip nhrp map wrong 10:-NAS NAT configured wrong on r23. P:s I might not visit the forum till my next CCIE>
  4. I have seen the people resolved the old labs ( Like Mclimak and Jiballs) , is there any one who resolved the new lab ? or any part of it, please share it with the other people. my system crashed couple of days ago and I have been out of the Forum, I ordered new hard drive and hopefully will start working on it again. New Lab is attached. (Can senior member please this is the latest at the moment) New_Lab1-quest.doc
  5. Dear All, Its been amazing to write into forum and i hope everyone wish to write the story of success to motivate and get motivated. Myself and one of Friend passed on 9th feb, took little time to realize and now back with another target Here is quick lookback- Ticket-1 # Issue of DHCP- Was pretty simple as VLAN100 on Sw2 port was not configured Ticket-2 # R12-R17 CHAP - R12 was not having default gateway with DHCP pool, and R17 route default command to install the default route to reach other subnets via R12. Ticket-3 # OSPF Load Balancing - R5 having max-metric router-lsa and one of the interface having ip ospf cost 1, whcih i change to 10. Ticket-4 # EIGRP Load Balance - R12 having interface bandwidth as 1000 (changed to 10000 equal to reference bandwidth) and output was given with 1703/1603 metric, so assigned metric weight 0 1 1 1 1 Ticket-5 # Router-Trace from R12 (2 Internal and 2 External) - Issue was with 194.1.1.1, has to change route-map whcih set different local-pref to match the prefix-list of "128.0.0.0/1 le 32" on R21 which i changed to "194.1.1.0/24 le 32" Ticket-6 # IPV6 Reachability - Mobile router had static ipv6 address and default route, R25 was having wrong route-map for next-hop. Correcte the IPv6 address. Ticket-7 # DMVPN issue (4 mark) - R15 redistribute connected interface into EIGRP, so i exlcuded the NBMA interface by route-map and all all other interface to redistribute to stop recursive routing. Question clearly ask for spoke to spoke traffic without HUB, so added "no ip split-hori eigrp 200" and "ip nh redirect" on R15 and R17/18/19 " ip nh shortcut " To confuse there was a ACL on R19 which blocks GRE and ISAK, but this was having wrong subnet match, so it was not impacting the DMVPN and EIGRP to come up. Ticket-8 # MPLS-VRF Ping and Trace - It was tricky one, need to match the output whcih has trace including 124.x.x.x subnet and clearly ask as if R7 shut, traffic has to pass through R8. R3 and R4 has 2 VRF (HUB and SPOKE), SPOKE VRF export the RT 65100:100 and HUB VRF import the RT 65100:101 and 65100:102 R5 and R6 has one SPOKE VRF - Which import the RT 65100:100 and export 65100:101 and 102 respectively. R7 and R8, having issue with NAT configuration, which i corrected. R7 and R8 redistribute static and ospf route to BGP and further set the route-map to change the Metric for R3 and R4. I did default-route originate, whcih later realize that i would have not done as static route was already giving 0/0, however not to change the import or RT brings the right trace. Ticket-9 # DMVPN R24-R7. R24 and R23 both do the NAT, so enable "cry ipsec nat-t udp" on both and it was UP. Ticket-10 # NAS server Ping and telnet - Enable "ip domain lookup" and "ip http server" on NAS and " ip dns server" on R23 make the ping write. For telnet, R23 was having wrone NAT (ip nat outside instead of ip nat inside ) and Done... Diag - Was same as updated. LAB - Only change in Loopback interface IP's for Switches, No VRF and No Authentication on EIGRP, IP-FLOW, NTP without authentication and most all same. I sincerely THANKS to all, all members who brings the thought of sharing and discussing till end and cheers for the spirit. Regards,
  6. Hi Guys! Anyone could share this amazing book? IP Routing on Cisco IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR: An Essential Guide to Understanding and Implementing IP Routing Protocols Thanks!! Kind regards
  7. Section 2.4 EIGRP in AS 65222 · The EIGRP AS is 45678 · The interface lo0 at each router must be seen as an internal EIGRP prefix by all other routers · Ensure that EIGRP is not running on any interface that is facing another AS use any method to accomplish this requirement · R17 is the DMVPN hub, R18, R19 as the spoke, use the pre-config tunnel 0 · R17 must not query R18,R19 for eigrp active routes · R17 must not receive EIGRP summary ROUTES FROM R18,R19 Answer must show in end of the lab the following output: R17#sh int | grep 'is up' Ethernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up Ethernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up Ethernet0/3 is up, line protocol is up Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up Tunnel0 is up, line protocol is up Tunnel1 is up, line protocol is up R17#sh int | grep 'is up' | wc -l Can some one explain me how to run these two commands ? R17#sh int | grep 'is up' R17#sh int | grep 'is up' | wc -l Here is what I run and output for the first one but no sure about the second one, any help ? R17#sh int | include is up Ethernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up Ethernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up Ethernet0/3 is up, line protocol is up Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up Tunnel0 is up, line protocol is up Notice I dont see the Tunnel1 is up, becasue I dont have one, what should we do ? Finally, R17 must not query R18,R19 for eigrp active routes · R17 must not receive EIGRP summary ROUTES FROM R18,R19 R18(config)#router eigrp CCIE R18(config-router)#add ipv4 unicast autonomous-system 45678 R18(config-router-af)#eigrp stub ? connected Do advertise connected routes leak-map Allow dynamic prefixes based on the leak-map receive-only Set receive only neighbor redistributed Do advertise redistributed routes static Do advertise static routes summary Do advertise summary routes <cr> R18(config-router-af)#eigrp stub connected ? leak-map Allow dynamic prefixes based on the leak-map redistributed Do advertise redistributed routes static Do advertise static routes summary Do advertise summary routes <cr> R18(config-router-af)#eigrp stub connected So you think it would be right to do on R18 and R19 ? Thanks Roomi
  8. Hi all, am intrstrd to no which Rns LAB is happening in dubai . am planing to giv xm soon ther..need ur help
×
×
  • Create New...