Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'ccie R&S'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
    • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • CERTIFICATION - - - - - NO REQUESTS IN THESE FORUMS - - - - -
    • CISCO SYSTEMS
    • COMPTIA
    • LINUX
    • MICROSOFT
    • ORACLE
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    • SECURITY CERTIFICATIONS
    • SUN MICROSYSTEMS
    • WIRELESS
    • OTHER CERTIFICATIONS
  • CISCO TECHNICAL SECTION
    • CISCO LABS
    • GNS3
    • NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
    • SECURITY
    • WIRELESS
    • SERVICE PROVIDERS
    • COLLABORATION, VOICE AND VIDEO
    • DATA CENTER
    • SMALL BUSINESS
  • MICROSOFT TECHNICAL SECTION
  • OTHER TECHNICAL SECTION
  • TRAINING OFFERS & REQUESTS
  • CERTCOLLECTION MALL
  • GENERAL FORUMS
  • COMMUNITY CENTER

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 14 results

  1. Hello Everyone, Soon going to appear in for R&S lab exam, need small help related to DHCP snooping in very first TS question. One of TS exercises I found this problem where SW1 connected to SERVER1 is configured with command "ip dhcp snooping vlan 200" due to which SERVER1 is not getting the IP 172.16.200.200 I tried adding ip dhcp snooping trust command on the interface facing R7 and R8 on SW1 but no joy. Also tried number of options by studying about dhcp snooping. I am only able to solve this question by removing the command "ip dhcp snooping vlan 200" from SW1. I don't know if this is the right approach. Please help..
  2. Against the GB rules :- This is still not shared. may be time to start another GB for this. Anyone interested ?
  3. Cisco have just added new seats , go grab it before it is too late.
  4. Hey Guys, I am studying for my CCIE R&S , planning to take the written this year. I am looking for like minded people and would like to create an awesome study group, where we would not only pass the exam but understand what CCIE could do. If you want to join me just msg me with your skype id and will contact you. Thanks DL
  5. Hello guys, has anyone used the dumps found on prepaway.com?, I am currently using the file "cisco.braindumps.400-101.v2018-01-25.by.carol.396q.ete" just as reference for my studies, but I would like to know if someone has actually passed the exam using these files? [Hidden Content]
  6. Razor00

    MSDPv1 Doubts

    Hi guys, i am having a problem in Q.4 bgp . As the question says not to modify any config in AS 100 and 300. If i am correct then the only config we have to do is in AS 200.So why we are modifying configs in As 300 (R27) .As i have figured out that on R27 , the next-hop-self towards R28 is missing .Can u guys help me out here ? Thanks
  7. Hi all, I am sure this question would have been asked before. I like to know the best way to practice K-Labs? I know the IOU is really good but does anyone use real equipment? Thanks
  8. Guys, it was a bad start to the New Year; well I failed for the third time (once with version 3). After studying close to a decade with numerous vendor products and multiple bootcamps (not forgetting a lot of $$$$$) have given me sound knowledge in the field, but…., my ultimate dream is still not within my reach. I discovered this site almost 10 days ago and quickly starting preparing for the TS5 and skimmed through the K labs. I did not prepare for the MSDPv1 TS as I had MSDPv2 in my previous attempt so I was preparing for TS5, and I was very confident in TS5, I was able to solve all tickets in 1.15 hours, (except for the MPLS <<< this one was tricky). I personally thought I did pretty well in K8, but to my surprise I had only one 70% plus score. My BGP, Multicast, MPLS & IGP were all working perfectly. I was very disappointed by the low scores. Today I rechecked Soldiers K8 solutions and realized there have been some minor/negligible differences with Soldiers answers. Like – for switching I did not un-shut ports 1-5 on SW4. Or for OSPF I also configured SW3 with priority 0 together with R1 & R3. For MPLS I re-distributed Lo71 & 72 instead of advertising in BGP as network statements. (I am very confident this should not be an issue because it is ok to do this). NOTE: my MPLS section was working perfectly. I used 1 1 1 1 1 for the EIGRP metrics instead of the classic 10000 10 255 1 1500. I had ZERO for multicast although it was working fine. Anyways, very little positives out of this attempt too. If I am lucky enough to get a seat I might have one more attempt – and that’s it. I am now questioning the purpose of this exam (for me personally), it has taken too much out my life; I have come to a point – it does not motivate me anymore (it will certainly NOT give me more $$$$ in my current job). Apart from having acquired the knowledge and as a result finding a job I like (working in cutting edge technology and having earned the respect of peers); the CCIE prep has destroyed my personal life. I don't think life is meant to be this way. My plan: practice all TS and K labs (if I find the motivation). Any good advice will be appreciated Thanks all, sorry for the lengthy post. UD - thanks for your support.
  9. MST: For this ticket , we are not allowed to change the configuration on SW6. When you check you will find that vtp domain name and vtp password are different and on SW6 Eth1/0 is not allowing all the VLANs and Eth1/1 is allowing all. Then when you check ‘show spanning-tree mst 1’ and ‘show spanning-tree mst 2’ on both SW5 and SW6 you will find Eth1/1 is blocked for MST1 and on SW5 Eth1/1 is blocked for MST2. Verification commands used are below:- SW6#sh spanning-tree vlan 5 MST1 Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp Root ID Priority 24577 Address 0200.3000.2700 ß SW5 Cost 2000000 Port 33 (Ethernet1/0) Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 28673 (priority 28672 sys-id-ext 1) Address 0200.3000.2800 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Et1/0 Root FWD 2000000 128.33 Shr Et1/1 Altn BLK 2000000 128.34 Shr ( to influence the root port election on remote switch (SW6) for MST1, you need to change the port-priority to higher value on Eth1/0 on SW5) · For MST2 , SW6 is the Root Bridge . To change the Root port locally for MST2 , you need to change cost on Eth1/0 SW5#show spanning-tree vlan 56 MST2 Spanning tree enabled protocol mstp Root ID Priority 24578 Address 0200.3000.2800 ß SW6 Cost 2000000 Port 33 (Ethernet1/0) Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 28674 (priority 28672 sys-id-ext 2) Address 0200.3000.2700 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Et1/0 Root FWD 2000000 128.33 Shr Et1/1 Altn BLK 2000000 128.34 Shr SW5#show spanning-tree mst 2 ##### MST2 vlans mapped: 56,229-230 Bridge address 0200.3000.2700 priority 28674 (28672 sysid 2) Root address 0200.3000.2800 priority 24578 (24576 sysid 2) port Et1/0 cost 2000000 rem hops 19 Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ---------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Et0/1 Desg FWD 2000000 128.2 Shr Et0/2 Desg FWD 2000000 128.3 Shr Et1/0 Root FWD 2000000 128.33 Shr Et1/1 Altn BLK 2000000 128.34 Shr Configuration Required on SW5 since we are not allowed to change the config on SW6, are as follows:- Match the VTP domain name and password with SW6 SW5: Vtp domain cisco Vtp password CCIE Set port-priority and cost to influence the Root port election to make Eth1/1 FWD for both MST1 and MST2 SW5#show run int eth1/0 interface Ethernet1/0 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk duplex auto spanning-tree mst 1 port-priority 192 spanning-tree mst 2 cost 4000000 Change passive-interface configuration on OSPF configuration on SW5 router ospf 5 area 0 authentication message-digest passive-interface Vlan56 network 10.20.5.100 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.20.56.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.20.229.5 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 100.5.5.105 0.0.0.0 area 0 no passive-interface Vlan56 SW5#traceroute 10.20.6.100 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.20.6.100 VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id) 1 10.20.56.6 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec 2 10.20.6.100 0 msec * 0 msec
  10. hi need help i m not able to ping from R12,R13 to 1.2.3.4 please guide....
  11. If anyone has CCIE R&S workbooks of INE.com please share with me. I could not find a link on this forum. Following are the workbooks.. 1. Advanced Technology Labs 2. Advanced Foundation Labs 3. Advanced Troubleshooting Labs 4. Full-Scale Practice Labs I have completed the Advanced Technology Labs workbook only and hope to take the exam this year end. If you have those please give me a link. Thanks
  12. Hello Guys, I am planning to start a new study group for CCIE Enterprise Infrastructure. let me know who all are interested to join this group. Thanks,
  13. Friends Update: CCIE R&S old TS, HSRPv6 and Multicast diag and OLD LAB without vrf Everything was as it is and same no changes at all. This week update above Things asked in exam. Failed due to lack of confidence, exam fever and sleep. recommended to sleep well before exam and dont take tension chill.
×
×
  • Create New...