Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'eigrp'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
    • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • CERTIFICATION - - - - - NO REQUESTS IN THESE FORUMS - - - - -
    • CISCO SYSTEMS
    • COMPTIA
    • LINUX
    • MICROSOFT
    • ORACLE
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    • SECURITY CERTIFICATIONS
    • SUN MICROSYSTEMS
    • WIRELESS
    • OTHER CERTIFICATIONS
  • CISCO TECHNICAL SECTION
    • CISCO LABS
    • GNS3
    • NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
    • SECURITY
    • WIRELESS
    • SERVICE PROVIDERS
    • COLLABORATION, VOICE AND VIDEO
    • DATA CENTER
    • SMALL BUSINESS
  • MICROSOFT TECHNICAL SECTION
  • OTHER TECHNICAL SECTION
  • TRAINING OFFERS & REQUESTS
  • CERTCOLLECTION MALL
  • GENERAL FORUMS
  • COMMUNITY CENTER

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 20 results

  1. Hi All, Could you please post this one. [hide][Hidden Content]] Thanks a bunch.
  2. SECTION 2.2 - EIGRP IN AS34567 Configure EIGRP for ipv4 in the New York office (AS34567) according to the following requirements • The EIGRP AS is 34567 • The interface lo0 must be seen as an internal EIGRP prefix by all other routers • Ensure the EIGRP is not running on any interface that is facing another AS use any method to accomplish this • Using a single command on one switch only ensure that R8 installs two equal-cost route for the following three path I used offset-list 0 out 25344 on both switches to get 2 equal-cost routes. it seems is same as mclimak answer where delay 100 is applied under int vlan 34. any thoughts?
  3. Hi, I have been trying to leak a route to a stub eigrp using leak map in the stub configuration. I tested in real hardward, IOSv, IOSvL2, IOU, GNS3 15.0 Image and all of them returned unsuccessful. The leak map does not leak the route I specify both tested using ACL and Prefix list and in stub connected and stub summary Here is a sample config that I made. ###########Stube connected Test######### enable configure terminal access-list 99 permit 123.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 route-map LEAK2 match ip address 99 match interface gi1.12 router eigrp 100 eigrp stub connected leak LEAK2 end ###########Stube summary Test######### enable configure terminal ip prefix LEAK permit 10.1.3.3/32 route-map LEAK2 match ip address prefix LEAK match interface gi1.12 router eigrp 100 eigrp stub summary leak LEAK2 end
  4. Could somebody please provide a configuration example over how to configure authentication between eigrp named mode and normal mode routers, please. I cant find any document online providing authentication between these two.
  5. Hello everyone, Uploading some of GNS3 Vault labs created for web iou. These include some labs on MPLS, BGP, OSPF, EIGRP and RIP. It contains all the topology diagrams, initial configs and the instructions required to complete the lab. Created these a while back for myself as GNS3 eats up a lot of CPU and RAM. I hope these are helpful. Just drop a comment for any suggestions. External download link -[hide] [Hidden Content]] iou-web-export-20131023172633 (GNS3 Vault Labs).gz
  6. Hi folks, I've been lurking these forums for a while. It's good to see so many forum members with the same objective. I've been practicing INE workbook on their rack rentals. I've gone thru the ATC videos also. There are times when EIGRP/RIP redistribution from BGP VPNV4 does not work *unless* you set the IGP metric manually. I verify that this is the case by simply looking at "show ip eigrp vrf xxx topology ; show ip rip vrf xxx database". If the route is present BGP table for that VRF and not in the topology, I know that something screwy is going on with the metrics and I apply the fix of manually setting the IGP metric while redistributing VPNV4 BGP routes into customer's IGP process. It's been a pain to figure out in what cases these bugs manifest. If you have run into this and know where exactly this gets broken for RIP/EIGRP redistribution, please share your experience. Thanks
  7. EIGRP Simulation After adding Interior router, no routing updates are being exchanged between Perimeter and the new location. All other inter connectivity and Internet access for the existing locations of the company are working properly. The Task is to identify the fault(s) and correct the router configurations to provide full connectivity between the routers. Access to the router CLI can be gained by clicking on the appropriate host. All passwords on all routers are cisco. IP Address are listed in the chart below [Hidden Content] Steps Remove invalid Autonomous System Number and add the correct Autonomous System Number Interior router. The Autonomous System Number is found in the topology: Add the network address of Fa0/0 interface of Perimeter router in EIGRP configuration. Because EIGRP neighbor relationship is not possible without the configuring connected interfaces. Answer Commands First we should check the configuration of the Interior Router. Click the console PC “F” and enter the following commands. Interior> enable Password: cisco Interior# show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration : 770 bytes ! version 12.2 no service timestamps log datetime msec no service timestamps debug datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname Interior ! enable secret 5 $1$mERr$hx5rVt7rPNoS4wqbXKX7m0 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.77.34 255.255.255.252 duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.60.65 255.255.255.240 duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet1/0 ip address 192.168.60.81 255.255.255.240 duplex auto speed auto ! router eigrp 22 network 192.168.77.0 network 192.168.60.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ! line con 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Interior# From the output above, we know that this router was wrongly configured with an autonomous number (AS) of 22. When the AS numbers among routers are mismatched, no adjacency is formed. (You should check the AS numbers on other routers for sure) To solve this problem, we simply re-configure router Interior router with the following commands: Interior# conf t Interior(config)# no router eigrp 22 Interior(config)# router eigrp 222 Interior(config-router)# network 192.168.60.0 Interior(config-router)# network 192.168.77.0 Interior(config-router)# no auto-summary Interior(config-router)# end Interior# copy running-config startup-config Second we should check the configuration of the Perimeter Router. Click the console PC “G” and enter the following commands. Perimeter> enable Password: cisco Perimeter# show running-config Building configuration... Current configuration : 1029 bytes ! version 12.2 no service timestamps log datetime msec no service timestamps debug datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname Perimeter ! enable secret 5 $1$mERr$hx5rVt7rPNoS4wqbXKX7m0 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.77.33 255.255.255.252 duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/0 ip address 192.168.36.13 255.255.255.252 clock rate 64000 ! interface Serial0/1 ip address 192.168.60.25 255.255.255.252 clock rate 64000 ! interface Serial1/0 ip address 198.0.18.6 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1/1 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1/2 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1/3 no ip address shutdown ! router eigrp 222 network 192.168.36.0 network 192.168.60.0 network 192.168.85.0 network 198.0.18.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 198.0.18.5 ! line con 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Perimeter# Notice that it is missing a definition to the network Interior. Therefore we have to add it so that it can recognize Interior router Perimeter# conf t Perimeter(config)# router eigrp 222 Perimeter(config-router)# network 192.168.77.0 Perimeter(config-router)# end Perimeter# copy running-config startup-config Now the whole network will work well. You should check again with ping command from router Interior to other routers! In Short: Interior RouterInterior>enable Password: cisco Interior# conf t Interior(config)# no router eigrp 22 Interior(config)# router eigrp 222 Interior(config-router)# network 192.168.60.0 Interior(config-router)# network 192.168.77.0 Interior(config-router)# no auto-summary Interior(config-router)# end Interior# copy running-config startup-config Perimeter RouterPerimeter>enable Password: cisco Perimeter# conf t Perimeter(config)# router eigrp 222 Perimeter(config-router)# network 192.168.77.0 Perimeter(config-router)# end Perimeter# copy running-config startup-config Download Lab file (requires packet tracer) [Hidden Content] Some Modification in Question After adding Interior router, no routing updates are being exchanged between Perimeter and the new location. All other inter connectivity for the existing locations of the company are working properly. But Internet connection for existing location including Remote1 and Remote2 networks are not working. Faults Identified: 1. Incorrect Autonomous System Number configured in Interior router. 2. Perimeter router does not advertise route to the new router Interior. 3. Internet Connection is not working all stations. We need to correct the above two configuration mistakes to have full connectivity Steps: 1. Interior Router: Change the Autonomous System Number of Interior 2. Perimiter Router: Add the network address of interface of Permiter that link between Perimeter and Interior. 3. Perimiter Router: Add default route and default-network. Check the IP Address of S1/0 interface of Perimeter Router using show running-config command. (The interfaced used to connect to the ISP)! interface Serial1/0 ip address 198.0.18.6 255.255.255.252 ! For Internet sharing we have create a default route, and add default-network configuration. The IP address is 198.0.18.6/30. Then the next hop IP will be 198.0.18.5. Interior Router Interior>enable Password: cisco Interior# conf t Interior(config)# no router eigrp 22 Interior(config)# router eigrp 222 Interior(config-router)# network 192.168.60.0 Interior(config-router)# network 192.168.77.0 Interior(config-router)# no auto-summary Interior(config-router)# end Interior# copy running-config startup-config Perimeter RouterPerimeter>enable Password: cisco Perimeter# conf t Perimeter(config)# router eigrp 222 Perimeter(config-router)# network 192.168.77.0 Perimeter(config-router)# exit Perimeter(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 198.0.18.5 Perimeter(config)# ip default-network 198.0.18.0 Perimeter(config)# exit Perimeter# copy running-config startup-config Important: If you refer the topology and IP chart, the Perimeter router uses Fa0/0 to connect Interior router, S0/0 used to connect Remote1, and S0/1 used to connect Remote2. Refer to the command show running-config, the command #PASSIVE-INTERFACE <Interface Name> will deny EIGRP updates to specified interface. In that case we need to use #no passive-interface <Interface Name> to allow the routing updates to be passed to that interface. For example when used the #show run command and we see the output like below.! router eigrp 22 network 192.168.77.0 network 192.168.60.0 passive-interface FastEthernet 0/0 passive-interface Serial 1/0 no auto-summary ! Then the command would be Perimeter(config)#router eigrp 222 Perimeter(config-router)#no passive-interface Fa0/0 Perimeter(config-router)#end Also Perimeter router connect to the ISP router using Serial 1/0. If you seen passive-interface s1/0, then do not remove it using #no passive-interface s1/0 command. Download Lab file (requires packet tracer) [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]
  8. Hi all, Anyone please share INE video: Intermediate EIGRP Course Intermediate OSPF Course Intermediate BGP Course Thanks
  9. Have anybody tried "ip default-network" with EIGRP on IOU I have tried this on WebIOU but doesn't seem to work Please share if anybody get this working as expected. My config... R1 <-> R2 <-> R3 all running EIGRP. R1 has a loopback with IP address 200.1.1.1/24 and it is advertised to EIGRP. R2 has ip default-network 200.1.1.0 I'm expecting on R3, 200.1.1.0/24 route to have D* in front of it in the routing table Please share your thoughts...
  10. mkfd2424

    k8 EIGRP

    Friends - for k8 2.2 the task states: SW4 must receive six EIGRP external prefixes from BB3 When I enable EIGRP on SW4 SVI in IOU I am seeing 10 external EIGRP prefixes on SW4 (route table below). Does the question mean exactly six prefixes or at least six prefixes? Is distribute list needed on SW4 to block some routes and if so which ones? Rack8SW4#sh ip route Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP + - replicated route, % - next hop override Gateway of last resort is not set 4.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets D EX 4.1.1.0 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 18.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 18.9.9.9 is directly connected, Loopback0 150.3.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 150.3.8.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan300 L 150.3.8.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan300 198.1.1.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets D EX 198.1.1.4 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.2.1.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.2.3.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.2.5.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.198.1.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.198.4.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.198.5.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.198.21.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 D EX 198.198.22.0/24 [170/130816] via 150.3.8.254, 00:00:47, Vlan300 Many thanks.
  11. ccnpdeb

    EIGRP

    Hi Guys, Can some one help me to remove an offset-list. What i know is that if we use offset list , it will add delay to a route specified by acl. For Ex.. router eigrp 145 network 145.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 offset-list 10 out 1000 passive-interface Ethernet2/0 passive-interface Serial4/0 This configuration will increase delay by 1000 for all routes matching acl 10. What I am doing is "offset-list 10 out 0". Is there any better way of doing this
  12. There is a question in cert section 1-1 which says to implement rip , then Mutual redistribution between rip and eigrp at Sw4 and Mutual redistribution between rip and ospf on r2 Condition : eigrp learned routes should be preferred over ospf My doubts in answer is At r2 #router rip redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 routemap ospfdefault offsetlist 0 out 4 fa0/1.24 at sw4 - router rip redistribute eigrp yy metric 2 my understnd is : This is for route selection at r4 , where rip only running, there all routes from sw 4 and r2 will come with AD 120 but using above offset list ospf learned routes will be reached with metric 5. am i right ? Can ' we use metrci 1 at sw 4 when redistibuting? My next doubt is at sw4 sw4#ip prefix-list netrip permit yy.yy.4.4/32 yyy.yy.15.32/27, yy.yy.15.64/27 these 3 permitted route-map Net-rip permit 10 match ip addres prefix netrip then router eigrp 19 # redistibute rip metric 1544 2000 255 1 1500 routemap Net-rip Why only those routes are permitted other routes are implicitly denied , and why this routemap is used.
  13. QUESTION NO: 62 Which three statements are true about EIGRP route summarization? (Choose three.) A. Manual route summarization is configured in router configuration mode when the router is configured for EIGRP routing. B. Manual route summarization is configured on the interface. C. When manual summarization is configured, the summary route will use the metric of the largest specific metric of the summary routes. D. The ip summary-address eigrp command generates a default route with an administrative distance of 90. E. The ip summary-address eigrp command generates a default route with an administrative distance of 5. F. When manual summarization is configured, the router immediately creates a route that points to null0 interface. Answer: B,C,F it is from p4s i do not understand why C is correct.... according to the [Hidden Content] This route is not marked as a summary route in any way; it looks like an internal route. The metric is the best metric from among the summarized routes. Note that the minimum bandwidth on this route is 256k, although there are links in the 10.0.0.0 network that have a bandwidth of 56k.
  14. R19 *Dec 23 20:51:10.207: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 200: Neighbor 172.16.10.17 (Ethernet0/0) is down: Interface PEER-TERMINATION received interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 172.16.10.19 255.255.255.248 ip authentication mode eigrp 200 md5 ip authentication key-chain eigrp 200 ccie ip hello-interval eigrp 200 600 R19# *Dec 23 20:51:14.982: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 200: Neighbor 172.16.10.17 (Ethernet0/0) is up: new adjacency R19#show ip eigrp int det e0/0 EIGRP-IPv4 Interfaces for AS(200) Xmit Queue PeerQ Mean Pacing Time Multicast Pending Interface Peers Un/Reliable Un/Reliable SRTT Un/Reliable Flow Timer Routes Et0/0 3 0/0 0/0 6 0/2 50 0 Hello-interval is 600, Hold-time is 15 Split-horizon is enabled Next xmit serial <none> Packetized sent/expedited: 899/286 Hello's sent/expedited: 276/382 Un/reliable mcasts: 0/540 Un/reliable ucasts: 1086/819 Mcast exceptions: 198 CR packets: 196 ACKs suppressed: 82 Retransmissions sent: 47 Out-of-sequence rcvd: 27 Topology-ids on interface - 0 Authentication mode is md5, key-chain is "ccie" R19# R17 *Dec 23 20:51:34.517: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 200: Neighbor 172.16.10.19 (Ethernet1/0) is up: new adjacency R17(config-if)# *Dec 23 20:51:49.570: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 200: Neighbor 172.16.10.19 (Ethernet1/0) is down: holding time expired R17(config-if)#do sh run int *Dec 23 20:51:53.934: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: EIGRP-IPv4 200: Neighbor 172.16.10.19 (Ethernet1/0) is up: new adjacency R17(config-if)#do sh run int e1/0 Building configuration... Current configuration : 157 bytes ! interface Ethernet1/0 ip address dhcp ip authentication mode eigrp 200 md5 ip authentication key-chain eigrp 200 ccie ip hold-time eigrp 200 6000 end R17(config-if)#do show ip eigrp int det e1/0 EIGRP-IPv4 Interfaces for AS(200) Xmit Queue PeerQ Mean Pacing Time Multicast Pending Interface Peers Un/Reliable Un/Reliable SRTT Un/Reliable Flow Timer Routes Et1/0 1 0/0 0/0 12 0/2 56 0 Hello-interval is 5, Hold-time is 6000 Split-horizon is enabled Next xmit serial <none> Packetized sent/expedited: 29/10 Hello's sent/expedited: 50/11 Un/reliable mcasts: 0/20 Un/reliable ucasts: 10/10 Mcast exceptions: 0 CR packets: 0 ACKs suppressed: 0 Retransmissions sent: 0 Out-of-sequence rcvd: 0 Topology-ids on interface - 0 Authentication mode is md5, key-chain is "ccie" R17(config-if)#
  15. Gents.... On the CCIE labs, we are asked to send updates only out of the interfaces as indicated in the toplogy....Please answer this simple question for me: Is 'passive interface default' used under the routing process in question? And then 'no passive interface fastethernet 0/x' for the interface we want updates from? I ask this because I've noticed when those who provide information on their exam experience, section 2 specifically, it's not shown when they dump their configs...I just curious if it's an understood assumption Anyone who passed configs and aced section 2, kindly respond. I know it sounds nonsensical.... Best Regards, DL
  16. Hi Guys, I was working with EIGRP summary address configuration of INE volume 1 EIGRP-5.9. As per the task i have applied summary address with default route on R4 s1 and S2 interfaces. Post configuring this, AD value of 5 is added in both the interfaces automatically and AD valus is visible in the routing table which points to Null0. If i see routing table in R5 i cud see that two default routes are installed with default internal AD value(90). Now below are my questions regarding this task. Why am not able to see the AD value in R5? - This could be because AD value is not advertised/utilised when there is no other IGP protocal running in the network. Need clarification!!! If i increase the AD valu of summary address on any one of the i/f from 5 to 6, In R5 RIB i cud see only one default route is installed in the routing table and another chossed as feasible Successor. Below is the config of R4 and R5 topology table... Rack5R4#sh running-config int s1/0.1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 163 bytes ! interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point ip address 155.5.0.4 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 100 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 6 frame-relay interface-dlci 405 end Rack5R4#sh running-config int s1/1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 154 bytes ! interface Serial1/1 ip address 155.5.45.4 255.255.255.0 ip summary-address eigrp 100 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 6 serial restart-delay 0 clock rate 64000 end Rack5R5#sh ip eigrp topology 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 0.0.0.0/0 State is Active, Query origin flag is 3, 1 Successor(s), FD is 4294967295 Waiting for 3 replies Routing Descriptor Blocks: 155.5.45.4 (Serial1/1), from 155.5.45.4, Send flag is 0x0 Composite metric is (4294967295/4294967295), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit Total delay is 167772159 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 0 Exterior flag is set 155.5.0.4 (Serial1/0), from 155.5.0.4, Send flag is 0x0 Composite metric is (4294967295/4294967295), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit Total delay is 167772159 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 0 Exterior flag is set Can any one help on this...
  17. Im reading CCNA and eigrp section .i cant find MTU in eigrp metric calculation so When mtu come in play in eigrp protocol ?
  18. Cisco Live invites you to share and learn from peers and Cisco experts in a worldwide content-based community. [hide][Hidden Content]] These are all that I had planned to download.
  19. Hi Guys , I just wanted to know if there is any difference in below configuratin. access-list 1 deny any router ei 100 distribute-list 1 in or distribute list 1 in f0/0 When I am doing "distribute-list 1 in", i can see the results as expected. But when I am doing "distribute-list 1 in f0.1", results are not extected and I am getting all routes. PLease suggest.
×
×
  • Create New...